Re: New release of GTK+ libraries (1.3.15). Please test!
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Sander Vesik <sv117949 ireland sun com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: New release of GTK+ libraries (1.3.15). Please test!
- Date: 25 Feb 2002 11:52:35 -0500
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 11:00, Sander Vesik wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, James Henstridge wrote:
>
> > Padraig O'Briain wrote:
> >
> > >I have used -no-undefined in LDFLAGS in ATK and GAIL to catch problems (mostly
> > >typos) at compile time rather than run time.
> > >
> > >One could omit -no-undefined, I suppose.
> > >
> > Last I checked, the libgcc library isn't meant to be linked against
> > shared libs, but rather programs (at least, that was the idea before
> > they started building a shared libgcc (AFAIK)). So the libs _would_
> > have undefined symbols, but they would be resolved against the syms in
> > the main program.
> >
>
> Well, thats pretty broken if you used gcc to build the library but not the
> program.
this was in fact the case with glib on hp-ux. i do not remember the
exact reason, but if glib was built with gcc then you could not use hp's
c compiler to build other things.
jacob
--
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]