Re: New release of GTK+ libraries (1.3.15). Please test!
- From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet ACT-Europe FR>
- To: Sander Vesik <sv117949 ireland sun com>
- Cc: James Henstridge <james daa com au>, Padraig O'Briain <Padraig Obriain sun com>, charlet ACT-Europe FR, otaylor redhat com, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: New release of GTK+ libraries (1.3.15). Please test!
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:05:40 +0100
> Well, thats pretty broken if you used gcc to build the library but not the
> program. If you have to know what compiler the shared library was built
> with (and potentially build/link the program with the same one) you are in
> the same situation that was supposed tobe bad about using c++...
In the case of Gtk+, it is *required* to use the same compiler for building
Gtk+ itself, and for compiling Gtk applications, since Gtk+ defines
some non portable/low level macros that are very compiler specific, so
this is not an argument.
concerning libgcc and shared libs, the situation is a little bit more
complicated than what has been described in other posts, but removing the
-no-undefined flags sounds like an acceptable and reasonable solution to me.
Arno
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]