Re: glib/pango/gtk+ RFC compliance.
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: erwann chenede sun com, gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, hidetoshi tajima sun com
- Subject: Re: glib/pango/gtk+ RFC compliance.
- Date: 08 Feb 2002 12:29:47 -0500
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 11:58, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> Erwann Chenede <erwann chenede sun com> writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > More questions for Sun's architecture review.
> >
> > Any idea about what RFC glib, pango and gtk+ are compliant to ?
> >
> > Toshi pointed out that :
> > Pango is compliant with RFC 3066 (format language tag).
> > And Gtk+ filesel and glib convert wrt to URI with RFC 2396.
>
> drag-and-drop can use standard mime types. GtkFileSel uses text/uri-list
> (RFC 2483) and for text drag and drop we can use text/plain (RFC 2046).
>
> But in general, as Sander says, RFC are about network communication,
> and GTK+ doesn't really do much of that.
however it does use a lot of X standards (DND, WM manager spec,
"XEmbed"). i don't know if erwann was interested in these.
jacob
--
"In fact, can you imagine anything more terrifying than a zombie clown?"
-- moby
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]