Re: u/int64 support for glib, status?

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

"Marcelo de G. Malheiros" <mgm valedofuturo unicamp br> writes:
> 
>   I fail to see the problem of including 'gint64'. This is truly a
> necessity, because sometimes you really need to have control of the
> size of an integer variable. Going through the madness of "is long
> long available and it's >= 64 bits?" every time you need such a thing
> is simply waste of time.

We have gint64 in glib 1.2, the issue here is G_TYPE_INT64. 

Havoc