Re: GtkLayout redundant fields ...

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 18:43, Owen Taylor wrote:
> 
> Michael Meeks <michael ximian com> writes:
> 
> > 	It seems GtkLayout's xoffset and yoffset are cruft left from the
> > old layout methodology.
> 
> Actually, I left them for backwards compatibility, since a lot
> of code was accessing these fields. Good idea? I don't know,
> but I'm inclined to leave it that way at this point.

I noticed this too. It doesn't seem like much compatibility is being
retained as using these fields doesn't seem to have any effect. At the
least, there should be comments by them saying that they are not used.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com