Re: 1.3.10 release candidates
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Tor Lillqvist <tml iki fi>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 1.3.10 release candidates
- Date: 25 Oct 2001 20:37:08 -0400
Tor Lillqvist <tml iki fi> writes:
> Owen Taylor writes:
> > I'd be especially interested to know if these are even close
> > to working on the various Windows platforms, and if not,
> > how we can improve that for future versions.
>
> With a couple of minor fixes, mainly to the makefile.mingw(.in) and
> .msc(.in) files, (already committed), GLib builds cleanly
> out-of-the-tarball on Windows with gcc (mingw) and MSVC. The tests
> also work, more or less, as well as they usually have.
I should redist the GLib tarball then to get these fixes, then?
> As for GTK, I haven't yet tested. Probably might not even build on
> Windows currently. Will have to wait for the weekend.
OK, we'll make building GTK+ on Win32 something for the next release.
> Should I commit the patches for autoconfiscated build of GTK on Win32
> (and retire the makefile.mingw stuff)? I guess this might alienate
> some people who have been able to build GTK+ using the
> makefile.mingws, but might feel auto*/configure/libtool is way over
> their head. OTOH, people used to these tools from Unix won't mind.
It's really your call; I don't have sufficient information to
make this decision. The less we can use separate manually
updated tarballs, the better, I think.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]