Re: Outstanding GIOChannel issues



At 13:48 05.08.01 -0700, Ron Steinke wrote:
>From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
>> Ron Steinke <rsteinke w-link net> writes:
>>
>> > The implementation of the new GIOChannel API for 2.0 is mostly
complete, but
>> > there are a few outstanding issues I'd like some comments on:
>> > 
>> >   * win32 implmentation:
>> >
It worries me as well, especially because I didn't get any response to
my mail "Re: g_io_channel_win32_new_fd() and is_*able"

>> > ...
>> > 
>> >     The problem in this area that worries me is that we haven't made
up our
>> >     minds how to handle O_BINARY (bug 57695). Ideas? Opinions? Anyone?
>>
>> Let's:
>>
>>  * Always specify O_BINARY on platforms where it matters
>
>The win32 people will need to include this in g_io_channel_new_file (),
>then. Win32 people, any opinions? Does anyone care?
>
Probably the right way to go. If i recall correctly otherwise seek would
fail as a bonus ...

>> [...]

	Hans
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to 
get along without it.                -- Dilbert




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]