Re: none
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: none
- Date: 13 Dec 2000 17:36:46 -0800
Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> On 13 Dec 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> >
> > Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> > > what? how's GtkObject deprecated?
> > >
> >
> > It has exactly one feature not found in GObject, which is the
> > "destroy" signal. Our claim is that "destroy" is only useful for GUI
> > objects, so "destroy" should really be in GtkWidget. So GtkObject is
> > just legacy cruft.
>
> well, to be technically correct, GtkObject has the ::destroy signal,
> weak references, flags, introduces the floating state, has
> get_arg/set_arg compatibility code and introduces the user_data property
> (though of questionable benefit since GObject now supports a property
> data::user_data).
Weak refs is another thing that would be useful in GObject, especially
since it was one of the proposed workarounds for not having a
"destroy" signal.
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]