Re: libgnomecanvas

[Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>]

On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 10:39 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:

> > that page is just for canvases can be used by/integrated in GTK+;
> > QtGraphicsView was added as a reference point. that wiki page is not
> > meant to be "let's list all canvases in existence so that people can use
> > them".
>
> from the page:
>
> "This page tries to collect highlights and drawbacks for the most known 
> canvases around"

yes; as I said: the canvases are the ones meant to be used/blessed by
the gtk+ team.

> "Candidates for a new GtkCanvas are marked with a colored row. Other 
> canvases are just for comparison."

again, yes. no need to add *every* single canvas in existence. otherwise
I might just add CoreAnimation and WPF or Silverlight.

btw, the "candidates" should be un-colored; there are no candidates, and
no decision was ever made.

> > let's not add stuff that doesn't make sense.
>
> 2 solutions:
>
> 1) You let Evas in the list. Someone added it (not me), then don't 
> give *false* informations on it. The guy who described Evas didn't know it 
> well. Btw, i just *updated* informations. Again, I didn't add Evas in the 
> list.

as you might have noticed, this is a wiki page; anyone can add stuff. in
theory, it should have been removed as soon as it was added; I didn't
notice that somebody added Evas after the page was created - and I have
a watch on the page. probably flew underneath a lot of radars.

> 2) You remove it from the list.

which is what I'm going to do.

ciao,
 Emmanuele.

-- 
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name
B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi