Re: OpenGL, GtkGlArea, GtkGLExt
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: Carlos Pereira <jose carlos pereira ist utl pt>
- Cc: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: OpenGL, GtkGlArea, GtkGLExt
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:14:39 +0100
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:04 +0000, Carlos Pereira wrote:
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
3 mar 2008 kl. 22.48 skrev Carlos Pereira:
Hi Carlos,
GtkGLext seems to be the most popular GL Area to use these days. You
might also want to look at Clutter [1] or Pigment [2] which are
canvases offering some higher level abstractions for 2D/3D usages. It
depends a bit on what you need, if you just want an area for pure GL
I'd go with GtkGLext.
Regarding future inclusion of GL in GTK+ there is an open bug about it
in the Bugzilla [3], I started looking into it a while back but didn't
have time to get anything off my hard drive. There are some open
issues in that you can read about in the bug tracker.
Thanks Michael,
I have red a few times that thread, that Owen started five years ago,
and apparently there is agreement in the essentials:
1) remove all the fat from Gtkglext, namely the wrapper functions
discussed in that thread, make it a small library that cares only for
opengl integration, that works in the X window system but also in
Windows and Mac OS X, exactly as Gtk.
Correct.
2) change the name, for example to Gtkglarea 2.0*, the legitimate
sucessor to Gtkglarea 1 (the last version of Gtkglarea that I downloaded
last week is 1.99 and still comes with gtk_signal_connect and other Gtk
1.2* functions deprecated long ago)
No, gtkglarea is dead. We don't want a new widget. We want being able
to render to widgets using OpenGL as an alternative to using cairo.
That is, the GtkGlExt approach.
3) make it an official (but optional) Gtk library, downloadble from
www.gtk.org.
No. Push it into the Gtk+ tarball, probably as a new .so. Like gdk,
gdk-pixbuf, and gtk are different .so's.
I believe this would make Gtk more appealing, particularly for
scientific/engineering/architecture applications.
Carlos
Indeed.
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]