Re: combobox internal padding

[David Nečas (Yeti) <yeti physics muni cz>]

On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:53:55PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> Medora Schauer wrote:
> > That is very disappointing.  It means the resulting combobox is about
> > 25% bigger (in height) than it needs to be. Besides taking up a lot of
> > real estate, it is aesthetically unpleasing.
>
> The last statement is sure subjective.  I don't find anything unpleasing
> about its looks.

The `wasted' pixels would be probably used when the letters
inside had accents (for instance).  One may want every combo
box to have a different height depending on the text inside
(e.g. shrinking when it contains only lowercase letters such
as acemnorsuvwxz), but I too would not call that
aesthetically pleasing...

Yeti


--
Whatever.