Re: libglade frustration redux

[David Nečas (Yeti) <yeti physics muni cz>]

On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:58:29AM -0500, Freddie Unpenstein wrote:
> > Surely we can agree that theres no point in asking the maintainers
> > of the tarball to please give better documentation and examples, if
> > you've never even looked at the tarball right ?
>
> He shouldn't, but as a user of libglade who DID go and out figure out how to use it (I do still have some 
> "best libglade practices" issues to figure out, though), I don't see why I can't back him up in so far as 
> what I see as a good point.

Do the packagers read this list?
Do the maintainers read this list?
Do the maintainers control the packaging?
What is the point then?

Yeti


--
Whatever.