Re: Accompany index of deprecated symbols with GTK+ version?

["Jim George" <jimgeorge gmail com>]

> However, I learned that for quite a number of methods it is
> a good idea to drop the deprecated ones and instead
> use the replacements (less buggy, better UI, better source code
> readability, less source code, better performance).
> Usually it should indeed make sense, because otherwise there
> would have been no need to implement a replacement ;-)

Why not use the "deprecated" keyword in the headers? Then at least gcc
will warn you if you use deprecated functions and typedefs. This could
be made as a macro which gets expanded only if you're using gcc, and
if you have something like GTK_WARN_DEPRECATED defined first.