Re: sizeof(glong)

[Jan <janjakon mail ru>]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 06:17:55PM +0100, Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
> Dnia 14-01-2005, pi? o godzinie 19:38 +0300, Jan napisa?:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Interesting to me is 
> > sizeof(glong)==4
> > or
> > sizeof(glong)==8
> > on computer with 64bit processors, like amd64?
>
> That depends on which 64-bit arch we're talking about. Some have
> sizeof(glong) == 4, and some sizeof(glong) == 8. Generally, you should
> never ever assume anything about type size except the basic sizeof(char)
> <= sizeof(short) ... If you rely on size, use portable typedefs provided
> by glib, ie gint32/64.
I know it, but I one proof  to one man that suppose
the sizeof(glong) is the same on the different platforms - wrong.
So I need facts.