Re: Questions I should have asked
- From: Alf C Stockton <alf stockton co za>
- To: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org, dev-cpp-users lists sourceforge net
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Questions I should have asked
- Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 13:56:24 +0200 (SAST)
Thank you for all the replies I received it makes me feel good that I am not
necessarily the only one on the bleeding edge of using Open Source on Windows.
While I attempt some of the compiler/linker switches suggested may I put the
following problem forward again.
I am now getting Gtk-ERROR** Incompatible Build when I attempt to
run my Linux developed application on Windows.
Tor Lillqvist <tml iki fi> original reply was:-
Doesn't the message say what to do? This message comes from this
g_error() call:
g_error ("Incompatible build!\n"
"The code using GTK+ thinks GtkWindow is of different\n"
"size than it actually is in this build of GTK+.\n"
"On Windows, this probably means that you have compiled\n"
"your code with gcc without the -fnative-struct\n"
"(or -mms-bitfields) switch, or that you are using\n"
"an unsupported compiler.");
I.e. you need to compile your source code with the -mms-bitfields gcc
switch.
Tor thank you for this suggestion but when I attempt it by adding the
-mms-bitfields to the linker options I still get "Incompatible build!" & when I
add it to the compiler switches I get told by cc1.exe that "output filename
specified twice".
I get the same effect if I use -fnative-struct so now I am really confused.
---
Regards,
Alf Stockton www.stockton.co.za
There's only one way to have a happy marriage and as soon as I learn
what it is I'll get married again.
-- Clint Eastwood
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]