Re: About Glade

[Keith Sharp <kms passback co uk>]

On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 15:58, Michael Koppelman wrote:
> But you don't have to! It works perfectly fine to let Glade generate 
> the code for you and there is no drawback that I can see. In fact, it 
> probably performs slightly faster and has one or two less dependencies.

The perceived wisdom, of those far more experienced than me, is that
using the code generation feature of Glade is a bad thing:

http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/glade-devel/2003-February/000015.html

Keith.