C++ Versus C (Was Re: Java Versus gtk)
- From: Tristan Van Berkom <vantr touchtunes com>
- To: Michael L Torrie <torriem chem byu edu>
- Cc: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: C++ Versus C (Was Re: Java Versus gtk)
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:44:22 -0500
Michael L Torrie wrote:
[snip]
Clearly that code is not as robust nor safe (or probably even correct)
but I just wanted to show that C can be almost a flexible as C++.
I'm sorry,
I know this thread is getting pretty carried away and all,
I'm just surprised that you use the word "almost", in what way
can C++ be more flexable ?
Best Regards,
-Tristan
PS:
Maybe I should read some paper on "why was C++ invented", (anyone
have a pointer to that ?) all I've got so far is "to have a C flavor
of OOP *language*", and we already know that we can achive OOP using
libraries and alot of boilerplate code. When we found out how usefull
<string.h> was; we didn't invent a new compiler.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]