RE: Signals and marshaling
- From: "Dmitry Ponomaryov" <eagleowl comail ru>
- To: "Donna S. Martin" <gtk-app-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: Signals and marshaling
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:52:05 +0300
-----Original Message-----
From: gtk-app-devel-list-admin gnome org
[mailto:gtk-app-devel-list-admin gnome org]On Behalf Of Donna S. Martin
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 7:23 PM
To: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Signals and marshaling
Oops, I should elaborate on this statement,
as I realize it is misleading:
Ok.
Your 'Quit' should be tied to your destroy
callback rather than your delete-event.
If you are exiting within the delete-event
and not processing the destroy, then it
won't work :-).
I simply meant you can't tie your 'Quit's activate
to a delete-event callback as the prototype is
different.
This is the reason why I write my own marshaller. :-)
---
Dmitry Ponomaryov
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]