Re: [PATCH] tracker: use "nfo" ontologies for media

[Jussi Kukkonen <jku linux intel com>]

On 02/03/2011 12:03 PM, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 11:53 +0200, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
>> On 02/02/2011 10:12 PM, Juan A. Suárez Romero wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 19:33 +0200, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
>>>> nfo:Audio, nfo:Video, nfo:Image (file objects) make more sense than
>>>> the nmm counterparts (multimedia objects): as an example, not all
>>>> Photos will be marked as such, they may be just Images.
>>>> ---
> ...
>>
>> Option B is what most people seem to be doing at the moment -- the
>> downside of this is that if anyone later tries to do the right thing,
>> their data will appear broken in other apps (this is how I found the
>> problem in he first place -- a tracker miner doesn't necessarily know if
>> an audio item is music so I thought nfo:Audio made perfect sense in that
>> situation). Any opinions?
>>
>>  - Jussi
> 
> Why not consider all audio files you crawl from upnp as "nmm:MusicPiece"
> if they contain at least an Artist or Album or any other property that
> indicates it's not just a "cat /dev/urandom > ~/Music/music.wav" made
> file ?
> 

Yes, I will absolutely do this and I'm sure that will cover most files
grilo would be interested in. The point still stands: there may be audio
files that are not "music pieces".

 - Jussi