Re: [PATCH] tracker: use "nfo" ontologies for media

[Lionel Landwerlin <lionel g landwerlin linux intel com>]

On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 11:53 +0200, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 10:12 PM, Juan A. Suárez Romero wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 19:33 +0200, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> >> nfo:Audio, nfo:Video, nfo:Image (file objects) make more sense than
> >> the nmm counterparts (multimedia objects): as an example, not all
> >> Photos will be marked as such, they may be just Images.
> >> ---
...
> 
> Option B is what most people seem to be doing at the moment -- the
> downside of this is that if anyone later tries to do the right thing,
> their data will appear broken in other apps (this is how I found the
> problem in he first place -- a tracker miner doesn't necessarily know if
> an audio item is music so I thought nfo:Audio made perfect sense in that
> situation). Any opinions?
> 
>  - Jussi

Why not consider all audio files you crawl from upnp as "nmm:MusicPiece"
if they contain at least an Artist or Album or any other property that
indicates it's not just a "cat /dev/urandom > ~/Music/music.wav" made
file ?

--
Lionel