Re: [PATCH 2/7] core: Add API to handle "content-changed" signal

["Juan A." Suárez Romero <jasuarez igalia com>]

On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 07:14 +0000, Iago Toral wrote:
> 
>  For consistency, I would rather have:
> 
>  g_return_val_if_fail (grl_media_source_supported_operations 
>  (GRL_METADATA_SOURCE (source)) &
>                          GRL_OP_NOTIFY_CHANGED, FALSE);
> 
>  and remove the if() checking for the presence of notify_changed_stop 
>  below, just like in notify_start. 

In this case, keeping consistency with other functions, we should also
the extra GError parameter, shouldn't we?


	J.A.