Re: libgsf tweaks
- From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu>
- To: Morten Welinder <mortenw gnome org>
- Cc: Gnumeric Mailing List <gnumeric-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: libgsf tweaks
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:12:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Morten Welinder wrote:
Please open a bug report for this -- it's better for documentation and
keeping track of things.
gsf_output_memory_steal_bytes is pretty straightforward.
gsf_output_gzip_new_full is a bit less so. Not because the
functionality is not good -- it is very reasonable -- but because
there are other fields in the gzip header that it might make sense to
add and I can't see us having _really_full and _really_really_full
versions. I need to think about that part.
Thanks, Morten. I take your point about gsf_output_gzip_new_full,
since there are other properties that might be set in a truly "full"
variant. My thinking was that the others seem to be internal matters
that libgsf wouldn't really want to expose to setting, but I accept
that may require some thought.
Allin Cottrell
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]