Re: Gnote and GNOME 3

[Aurimas Černius <aurisc4 gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

> I am planning to make 0.7.4 a GNOME 2.x release, and then create a stable-0.7
> branch for further GNOME 2.x releases. We can cherry-pick bug-fixes and
> backport sought after features from master to stable-0.7 if necessary.
> 
> We can carry on with the march towards GNOME 3 on master and make 0.8.0 our
> first GNOME 3 release.
> 
> The basic assumption is not to support both versions of GNOME in a single
> release.
> 
> Comments?


I completely support this idea.
I'm currently working towards porting Gnote to GTK 3. The state ATM is
around 50 patches with some up to 20 more to come (small, one issue at a
time style) and only about 20 of them can be committed to current Gnote
without changing dependencies. I'm strongly believe, that attempt to
have Gnote, that compiles with both Gtkmm 2 and 3 will result in nothing
but the messy code.

- -- 
Aurimas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNdpg2AAoJECtTeRAzEaLP6rwH/1m7IcuqaOknZ/WtOaLmiwXQ
auIfpkBoyBxFs6O+W7apuvsIPrxV87Esu4BBP7Qhzsq0V/nDNBJezNy643dwKbL3
/k7m5qJXb8k7XC5KPjqPtADt7CfwBfFyowso17JcnX4wDQg3hSr4w3iSpBK4Bmv1
TuC/cSOzjlWmCKnaCGPd79uVTGPGGd74vFhmf95oTAulufkSImMlTeDhec7awsHZ
utB6qgRkoFwz9CVtb2klp7eUvWRvR0MdEy7VS7IItQP4WHSQfG6YciS1bTK31rh1
q3L1JLFPSVR3MInDiVuvjj1FeHtJSnWgXn5RI1K5MZT7WjRSNDwI8X5H9ZvlLLY=
=nzjS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----