Re: [gnomemm] binary-incompatible changes to gnomemm 1?

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 12:13, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> On 27 Jan 2003, Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> > > So, how about this:
> > > 	in gnomemm1, new method 'fill_and_return'
> > > 	in gnomemm2, 'fill' is modified
> > 
> > OK. Patches with examples welcome.
> 
> I've just sat down to do this, however, it turns out that in gnomemm2,
> 'fill' is broken because it's declared in Gnome::UI::Info, but defined in
> Gnome::UI (so Gnome::UI::Info::fill is undefined)

Yes, we fixed something else similar recently.

> Which one should it be: Gnome::UI::fill or Gnome::UI::Info::fill? I vote
> for Gnome::UI::Info::fill since the former doesn't tell anything about
> _what_ is being filled.

Yes. I think the declaration is correct, and the definition needs
fixing.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com