Re: [gnomemm] binary-incompatible changes to gnomemm 1?

[ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>]

On 27 Jan 2003, Murray Cumming wrote:

> > So, how about this:
> > 	in gnomemm1, new method 'fill_and_return'
> > 	in gnomemm2, 'fill' is modified
> 
> OK. Patches with examples welcome.

I've just sat down to do this, however, it turns out that in gnomemm2,
'fill' is broken because it's declared in Gnome::UI::Info, but defined in
Gnome::UI (so Gnome::UI::Info::fill is undefined)
Which one should it be: Gnome::UI::fill or Gnome::UI::Info::fill? I vote
for Gnome::UI::Info::fill since the former doesn't tell anything about
_what_ is being filled.

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess...