Re: [gnomemm] binary-incompatible changes to gnomemm 1?
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: murrayc usa net
- Cc: GNOMEmm mailing list <gnomemm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnomemm] binary-incompatible changes to gnomemm 1?
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:15:29 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> I've just sat down to do this, however, it turns out that in gnomemm2,
> 'fill' is broken because it's declared in Gnome::UI::Info, but defined in
> Gnome::UI (so Gnome::UI::Info::fill is undefined)
> Which one should it be: Gnome::UI::fill or Gnome::UI::Info::fill? I vote
> for Gnome::UI::Info::fill since the former doesn't tell anything about
> _what_ is being filled.
sorry, that should be Gnome::UI::Items vs Gnome::UI.
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Soon we will be able to harness the rotational energy from Orwell's grave to solve all world energy problems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]