Re: [gnomemm] binary-incompatible changes to gnomemm 1?



On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, ERDI Gergo wrote:

> I've just sat down to do this, however, it turns out that in gnomemm2,
> 'fill' is broken because it's declared in Gnome::UI::Info, but defined in
> Gnome::UI (so Gnome::UI::Info::fill is undefined)
> Which one should it be: Gnome::UI::fill or Gnome::UI::Info::fill? I vote
> for Gnome::UI::Info::fill since the former doesn't tell anything about
> _what_ is being filled.

sorry, that should be Gnome::UI::Items vs Gnome::UI.

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Soon we will be able to harness the rotational energy from Orwell's grave to solve all world energy problems




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]