Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] forwarding the minimal number of ports



On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 07:07:41PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote:

> > Still, NAT autodetection gives me symmetric NAT.  What am I doing
> > wrong?  Where do I need more ports?  I think I could try to squeeze in
> > a couple more.
> > 
> 
> Are you sure they are really forwarded? 

I thought they were, but I rebooted, now I am getting unknown NAT
type.

> If you plan to use SIP only, only forward the RTP port range and the UDP
> Port range. I would use 6 ports for each.

Thanks, I will try.  Does anybody on this list have any success with
this router?

Tamas



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]