Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] forwarding the minimal number of ports
- From: Tamas K Papp <tpapp Princeton EDU>
- To: GnomeMeeting mailing list <gnomemeeting-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] forwarding the minimal number of ports
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:12:51 +0100
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 07:07:41PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > Still, NAT autodetection gives me symmetric NAT. What am I doing
> > wrong? Where do I need more ports? I think I could try to squeeze in
> > a couple more.
> >
>
> Are you sure they are really forwarded?
I thought they were, but I rebooted, now I am getting unknown NAT
type.
> If you plan to use SIP only, only forward the RTP port range and the UDP
> Port range. I would use 6 ports for each.
Thanks, I will try. Does anybody on this list have any success with
this router?
Tamas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]