Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, only one way and no video
- From: Benedek Frank <linux celifornia com>
- To: GnomeMeeting mailing list <gnomemeeting-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, only one way and no video
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:40:51 +0200
On Monday 13 June 2005 13:49, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Le dimanche 12 juin 2005 à 18:33 +0200, Benedek Frank a écrit :
> > > Have you checked that the machine running Netmeeting (ie not the one
> > > doing the NAT) has its firewall disabled completely?
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Yes, I disabled the SP2 firewall on the NM, and still no go. I dont have
> > access to any other machines on the same network, so I cannot try to
> > telnet into the box via 1720 from an internal machine, which would be
> > something to try. And on top of all that, it is behind a Japanese router,
> > which gives you the idea how easy it is to set it up, sepaking reading
> > almost no Japanese at all. That is why I set the DMZ. DMZ is DMZ in all
> > languages. Haha. Sorry to bother the list, I will try to contact the
> > routers maker for further instructions.
>
> Perahps you still need to forward 1720 from the router to the internal
> machine, even with the machine in the DMZ. Just blind-guessing here
> because the problem is weird.
Yes I thought about that also, but then one thing remains unexplained. Why
telneting on port 1720 gives a different response with Service Pack 2
firewall blocking the 1720 port and with the port open? One might think, that
if the firewall is blocking the access to port1720, changing something on the
computers internal firewall will not affect anything, as the firewall is
already blocking everything aiming the port. Hmm. Of course I will try your
aproach, and report back. If you think of anything else I may try with XP (I
dont know much XP), please let me know.
Thanks
Ben
>
> > Thanks
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]