Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] GM 3.00: a poll, please contribute

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

We basically have all advices here. The only thing that is clear from
the first answers to the poll, is that GM should primarily stay a
softphone.

So, if Jabber support is added at some point, it doesn't have to be as
complete as in an Instant Messenger, and it has to be an additional
feature, not the main thing.

As for changing the UI, some say we should, some say we shouldn't. So
Ill try to change only what is absolutely needed, and improve the
existing, without introducing a 100% really new design.


Le mercredi 06 avril 2005 à 23:19 +0200, Damien Sandras a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> To make sure everyone understands,   the purpose of the former
> discussion is to determine a few things :
> 
> 1) 
> Should the UI stay the same, or be changed? There is a proposition in an
> earlier mail.
> 
> 2) 
> should we stay a softphone with only SIP instant messenging, and nothing
> else?
> OR
> should we have jabber support and become that way a softphone with IM
> capabilities?
> OR
> should we stay a softphone and put our efforts into integration as an
> EXTERNAL component with Jabber clients?
> 
> 3)
> What's your profile? Softphone user or chatter? 
> 
> 4)
> If an MSN client was made available for Linux, would you still use
> GnomeMeeting and why? Would new users use the MSN client or
> GnomeMeeting?
-- 
 _      Damien Sandras
(o-     GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\     FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_    H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com