Hi Alexis, > I do not know why I do not upgrade : I installed the 9.0 by downloading the > three cd's, and I do not know if I can upgrade without downloading and > burning the cd's :) > > My system is OK and some users have problem with their software now that they > upgraded to 9.1. I prefer wait the 9.2 version which is waited by users. I do > not know who is right. > > Does i convinced you ??? :) hehe, as upgrading of all rpm-based distros gives me headaches, i'm using debian.. but i'm taking care of the GM packages, so i'm trying to make users happy =) i see your point in keeping 9.0, but the upgrade to 9.2 isn't gonna be better (check SuSE, all they fixed was to include a BACKUP before upgrading with 8.2 *ggg*) i guess we're gonna be doing 9.0 packages, as it's very few effort to expand the list of supported platforms releases, once we have the rpm specs working ;) please do be prepared though to expect the 9.0 support being dropped with 9.2.. else we'll end up supporting 9.0-12.3 in the next years ;) -- Best regards, Kilian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil