Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] [TOO LONG] Improving the dbus component after 2.0
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: GnomeMeeting development mailing list <gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] [TOO LONG] Improving the dbus component after 2.0
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:36:34 +0100
Le vendredi 17 mars 2006 à 11:31 +0100, CJ van den Berg a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> > Kilian Krause a écrit :
> > >which would be a kinda small percentage as I do remember EDS should
> > >become freedesktop.org standard. Thus, is there any benefit putting this
> > >onto the current TODO? Anyone know about how EDS developers see DBUS
> > >support on their schedule?
> >
> > That is an interesting point ; which in turn raises the following
> > questions :
> > - will EDS really become a fd.o standard ?
> > - is EDS part of the things Tor Lillqvist ported to win32 ?
>
> And how does all this fit in with galago? Isn't that also slated to become
> an fd.o standard? Wouldn't implementing a galago feed in Ekiga make the most
> sense? If I understand it correctly EDS support would come for free too
> right?
>
I think you are right. EDS won't be part of fdo, but Galago will and
Galago is able to use EDS.
Galago support would also allow (on Linux-only) to have full presence
support outside of simple SIP Presence support.
On WIN32, only SIP Presence support.
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o-
//\ Ekiga Softphone: http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_ FOSDEM 2006 : http://www.fosdem.org/
SIP Phone : sip:dsandras ekiga net
sip:600000 ekiga net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]