Hi Thomas, first, could you please stop to CC me, I do read the ML I post to unless I state otherwise. > > where do you take that insight from? Due to the fact that the snaps do > > build an unstrippted "opt" version rather than the "debug" version? > > The "release" version would be libopal-2.2.0 and libpt-1.10.0... > > > from the filename of the bt. mmh, AFAIK 1.11.0 and 2.3 are ok for CVS HEAD. Phobos should become 1.10.0 and 2.2.0 when it's ready and is right now at 1.9.3 and 2.1.3. Thus, no indication for "release" here. > > > >>for the debug snapshots make sure (debian) that LD_LIBRARY_PATH or so > >>contains /usr/lib/debug added. > > > > > > No need, that files there are external debug symbols, not libs. I.e gdb > > will use them transparently, no need to poke around ld.so... > > > not here, gdb doesnt use them. gdb env settings to adjust? At least in Debian it uses it straight away. I.e. all /usr/lib/$FILE will be mapped to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/$FILE to find its debug info. If that's not the case for your distro, then complain there. > what tweaking? a few weeks before make debug worked here fine. My point was that my Debian/Ubuntu snapshots do use the "opt" target with a hack to not strip the produced libs, so i can grab the debug symbols from there. The point in having the debug version is of course to be having more debug output, yet the libname does change. Thus that part of my debian/rules would fail which is expecting the filename without the _d.so.. I'm not entirely sure if I haven't even worked around that, so that it *might* just work, but well.. ;) > should i patch the Makefile with a make deb_install section? No. There is Debian sources and they do work nicely. Bringing this even more upstream than what we are doing just right now is not having any benefit. More or less, we're currently cleaning up the last remaining leftovers, so that all 3 libs (pwlib, openh323, opal) can be shipped mostly out-of-the-box. > and the Makefile variable override works, too. That one i didn't doubt. Whether I agree to use it like that is something else. But if it solves your problem, then it's fine with me. ;) -- Best regards, Kilian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil