Le dimanche 21 novembre 2004 à 09:00 +1100, Craig Southeren a écrit :
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:59:00 +0100
> Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com> wrote:
>
> > Craig,
> >
> > The GnomeMeeting release is imminent. Would it be possible to generate a
> > new release of OpenH323 and PWLib?
>
> Yes, this is something I have been intending to do. Once Robert is back
> online (should be Monday or Tuesday) I will confirm he has no additions
> and I will do a release, provided we can fix the bugs below.
>
Good news :)
> > There are actually 2 problems current openh323/PWLib CVS :
> > 1) the PWLIB V4L plugin still report twice each device since Derek's
> > change. Remember the discussion. What should we do until this is fixed
> > properly? Add a hack in GnomeMeeting for the V4L plugin? Or undo that
> > change in the plugin until we have a proper method for all plugins?
>
> Is this the "having two names for the same plugin" hack? If so, then
> please offer a patch for the plugin that fixes it and we can go from
> there.
Yes, line 540 in vidinput_v4l.cxx:
result += inputDeviceNames[i];
That should be removed until we find a better way to handle things in
all plugins.
If you do not want to remove that line, then we can also add specific
code in gnomemeeting to hide the duplicate name.
>
> > 2) Since you moved the Openh323 H.235 authentication classes to
> > PFactory, it has become impossible to register to gatekeepers, passwords
> > are rejected. Daniel has the problem with GNU GK and I have the problem
> > with the gatekeeper of the new PC-To-Phone provider. The problem doesn't
> > appear without your change.
>
> Wow - that is very weird. The changes I made only affect how the list of
> authenticators is populated, and is about 2 or 3 lines. It's probably
> the damn linker problem again, so I've added in some horrible hacks to
> force the list to be populated. Let me know if these work.
>
I have recompiled latest openh323 CVS from scratch and gnomemeeting too
(just in case) and there is still the same problem:
2004/11/21 12:35:46.261 0:01.025 Transactor:83c09f8 H225RAS
Receiving PDU: registrationReject 29032
2004/11/21 12:35:46.262 0:01.025 Transactor:83c09f8 Trans
registrationRequest rejected: securityDenial
2004/11/21 12:35:46.263 0:01.026 Transactor:83c09f8 H235RAS
Received unsecured RAS message (no crypto tokens), need one of:
H235AnnexD_Procedure1<active>,MD5<active>,MD5<active>
2004/11/21 12:35:46.265 0:01.028 GMH323Gate...r:083b9480 Trans
Response to seqnum=29032 had invalid crypto tokens.
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=