Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Registering to microtelco GK & IP translation (Firewall Problems ?)

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

Hello,

I have something for you to try, but you will have to compile
GnomeMeeting yourself and do a small modification.

Please contact me privately.

Le dim 04/05/2003 à 00:44, Bruno Tanqueray a écrit :
> Le sam 03/05/2003 à 01:40, Bruno Tanqueray a écrit : 
>  
> >> I've done tests with ohphone. 
> >> There is no capabilies (that I know ?) to have the beautiful IP translation  
> >> function. After a normal registration & call like :  
>  
> >I don't remember the option, but there is one option, look in main.cxx 
> ... 
> >> ohphone -u 123456789012 --password 1234 -g gk.microtelco.com -q0 
> 1415777345699 
> 
> I found the option, it was simply : --translate 170.56.78.123 (as Internet IP)
> With this option, I can't be registered by microtelco gw.
> 
> In console : translating IP, registering impossible !
> ----------------
> Listening interfaces : ALL:1720
> Masquerading as address MY_INTERNET_IP
> Enabling H.235 security access to gatekeeper.
> Error registering with gatekeeper at "gk.microtelco.com"
> OhPhone ended.
> ----------------
> 
> Without the translating option, I can be registered but I can't receive any 
> sound and the communication is quickly cut.
> 
> In console : no translation, registering easy but no sound :-(
> ----------------
> Listening interfaces : ALL:1720
> Enabling H.235 security access to gatekeeper.
> Gatekeeper set: bmac 66 7 159 99
> Waiting for incoming calls for "MY_ALIAS/1"
> Command ? Offhook - dialtone
> Playing dialtone
> ----------------
> 
> It's exactly the same problem known with Gnomemeeting.
> 
>  
> >If you can register without IP translation to the GK with ohphone, you 
> >should be able to do it with GnomeMeeting too. 
> 
> Yes, as I wrote before, I can do that.
> But after being registered, if I want to communicate, I must go into 
> parameters ad check the IP translation because without, I can't hear 
> anything... That's what I call my little gymnastic.
> It's a tip for geek, imagine my wife if I ask to do that ;-)
> 
> >>Ok, I will try to pick what I can. 
> >>But it's a very close system. 
> >>Perhaps I should swap to the cheap NAT system I've got at home :  
> >> old PC + IPCop Linux as firewall 
> >> At least I know it's H.323 compatible and it works perfectly for 
> >>gnomemeeting. 
> 
> >As long as you don't use the buggy H.323 NAT module, and you forward 
> >ports, it should work. I'm using iptables at home and have no problems 
> >to register to the GK. If it doesn't take too much time, it is worth a 
> >try... 
> 
> What you mean with buggy H.323 NAT module ?
> It's not as easy to use as expected ?
> Waiting for the new IPCop 1.3 (kernel 2.4 at least..)
> 
> >I'm happy that it works with the gymnastic, but it shouldn't 
> >require it ;) 
> 
> I know, I continue my investigations  ;-)
> 
> Bye
>  
>  Bruno Tanqueray 
>  btqy at free.fr 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
> Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
-- 
 _	Damien Sandras
(o-	GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\	FOSDEM 2003:  http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_	H.323 phone:  callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
echo
'12245692587856285105409351sn[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb[q]salbxq'|dc