Re: Timelapsed backgrounds
- From: Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
- To: Soeren Sandmann <sandmann daimi au dk>
- Cc: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>, gnomecc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Timelapsed backgrounds
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:19:21 +0100
Le mercredi 19 décembre 2007 à 16:57 +0100, Soeren Sandmann a écrit :
> Thomas Wood <thos gnome org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 06:29 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > A while back I sent mail to desktop-devel-list about timelapsed
> > > backgrounds:
> > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel-list gnome org/msg10860.html
> > >
> > > Those patches have now been applied to gnome-desktop and nautilus, so
> > > the only thing remaining is gnome-control-center. The patch is here:
> > >
> > > http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/control-center-bg.patch
> > >
> > > As the diffstat show, it's a win in terms of code size:
> >
> > That's a very large patch. Could you split it up into more manageable
> > chunks please?
>
> What parts do you find unmanageable? Here is an overview:
>
> - It adds a dependency on gnome-desktop 2.21.4, which has the GnomeBG
> class.
>
> - In gnome-settings-daemon-background, it loses the dependency on
> applier.[ch] from libbackground and instead just maintains a
> GnomeBG.
>
> - It deletes the files applier.[ch] since they are no longer used
>
> - In the appearance capplet it changes gnome-wp-item to use GnomeBG
> instead of doing all the pixbuf manipulations itself. It also
> redraws whenever the GnomeBG changes.
>
> If you really want me to separate the patch file into several smaller
> patch files, I'll do it, but I don't see the point.
The patch is breaking the build : libbackground should still built be in
main Makefile.am file.
Otherwise, it looks fine, I've pushed it in Mandriva cooker package
today.
--
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
Mandriva
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]