Re: Appearance Capplet Ideas
- From: Jens Granseuer <jensgr gmx net>
- To: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>
- Cc: Control Center List <gnomecc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Appearance Capplet Ideas
- Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 13:45:40 +0200
On 06.04.2007 19:20, Thomas Wood wrote:
> On 04/04/07 17:06, Jens Granseuer wrote:
> > * "Themes": when I looked at this tab for the first time I desperately
> > went looking for the button that let me customize stuff. That it's over
> > in the "Appearance" tab is rather non-obvious. At the very least
> > "appearence" should be capitalized in the hint (but "Appearance isn't
> > a good name anyway, as the others have pointed out).
>
> I think this is actually a symptom of knowing the old theme capplet too
> well. Once you realise what was going on, was it still so confusing?
I wouldn't say it was confusing as such, but it would be nice if the
relationship could be made a bit more obvious. I'd say your new
mockup with the hint text completely removed made matters a little worse
in that respect.
> > * "Appearance": what would this look like for themes which don't support
> > custom colours? Might get a bit crowded, especially if cursors move
> > there as well.
>
> I've put the cursors combo box into the mockups, and shown the "colours
> not supported" message. I don't think it's too cramped yet.
Agreed.
> > * we seem to be a little inconsistent regarding images in buttons
>
> Interesting one, especially as this is also a GTK+ style option. Stock
> buttons always use icons, but other buttons don't have to. I can see two
> possible policies here. We either insist on icons in all buttons, or we
> decide only stock buttons should have icons. Either way, the user should
> be able to disable all icons in buttons by using the GTK+ option.
Is it possible to disable non-stock images in buttons when using glade?
There's still a bug open about that [1].
> >> A few of the screens could do with cleaning up and simplifying (Fonts
> >> for example). What are people's opinions on "Advanced" buttons so that
> >> we can keep the main tabs clean and simple?
> >
> > I seriously detest "Advanced..." buttons. You can never tell what
> > lies beyond (and in most cases it doesn't have much to do with advanced)
> > so you'll have to take a look anyway. If we managed to come up with
> > reasonably telling labels, though, that wouldn't be much
> > of a problem (to me).
>
> I mostly agree here. The use of "Advanced..." buttons leads to excessive
> windows (such as those present in the Windows appearance settings).
> Let's make sure the settings are really important to include at all
> before just relegating them to an extra window.
While I agree that the fewer windows the better, my main point here
was that if we need those buttons they shouldn't be labelled
"Advanced..." in any case.
> >> The other things that are missing from the current layout are cursor
> >> settings (themes), and also any link to sound themes for the Themes tab.
> >> Perhaps cursor themes should be added to the Appearance category,
> >> underneath icons.
> >
> > One problem I can see with that is that we'll lose the preview.
> > It could maybe be put behind a "Preview" button in a separate window,
> > but in that case I'm not sure a combobox would work well here.
>
> I'm going to suggest icon sized previews in the combobox. As you can see
> I've filled it with a stock icon at the moment, but at least it gives
> some idea overall impression.
Hm, your new mockup has an icon preview for all theme types. For
mouse cursor, that's probably a good idea, but is it possible to
show a meaningful thumb-sized preview for GTK+/metacity/icon themes?
I doubt that.
Jens
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362880
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]