Re: Slab's CC
- From: Jürg Billeter <j bitron ch>
- To: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: Sreeves novell com, Control Center List <gnomecc-list gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Slab's CC
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:04:35 +0200
On Fre, 2006-10-13 at 16:43 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 09:47 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 19:28 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 16:48 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Following on this, I'm looking (and almost starting) to merge all the
> > > > > libs we have in c-c into a single libgnomecontrolcenter library. That
> > > > > means putting libbackground and libwindow-settings, and, if we all
> > > > > agree, libslab and libtile (while we look for a better place).
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone has anything against this? I guess we don't have ABI/API
> > > > > problems, since they're not platform libraries, right?
> > >
> > > Does this mean that nautilus will have to link to this lib (it currently
> > > has a libbackground module checkout)?
> > >
> > hmm, I guess so, although I am starting to think about leaving
> > libbackground as it is, since it seems to not have much use outside of
> > the c-c and Nautilus. Would nautilus depending on libgnomecontrolcenter
> > be acceptable?
> It strikes me as weird an unnecessary. It might also create build loops
> if say g-c-c ever wants to add a nautilus extension.
g-c-c already depends on nautilus for fontilus and themus, so it would
definitively create a build loop...
] [Thread Prev