Re: location management vs. session management
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>
- Cc: Bradford Hovinen <hovinen ximian com>, gnomecc-list gnome org, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: location management vs. session management
- Date: 30 Jul 2001 19:24:13 -0400
Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com> writes:
> Seemingly the location manager is really just a GUI that uses the
> archiver backend. Since we have a chooser GUI in gdm, does it make
> sense to drop the location manager GUI and have the archiver stuff
> [with associated rollbacks, rollforwards] being per-session, where
> gnome-session defines the session ie. through the sm-clientID?
>
My theory is that the current location manager GUI would become a
session manager GUI; it lets you check which settings are per-session.
Then there's just one "named group of settings" the user has to deal
with. Explaining "locations" vs "sessions" to a user gives me cold
sweats. ;-)
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]