Re: [Usability] window manager configuration
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- To: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, John Kodis <kodis jagunet com>, usability gnome org, gnomecc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] window manager configuration
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:03:38 +0000 (GMT)
On 8 Dec 2001, Seth Nickell wrote:
> On Sat, 2001-12-08 at 09:12, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> >
> > John Kodis <kodis jagunet com> writes:
> > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:13:39PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > >
> > > > One definition of a crack-ridden option is one that no one would
> > > > really want if they hadn't gotten used to using it in the past. How
> > > > many Windows users who've never used UNIX are demanding sloppy focus?
> > > > None whatsoever. So that option is stupid, if you were starting from
> > > > scratch.
> > >
> > > This criterion makes this whole discussion moot. Mac and Windows
> > > users aren't demanding multiple workspaces, yet they (along with
> > > sloppy focus) are among the features I value most about Unix desktops.
> >
> > I guess I'm oversimplifying a bit. ;-)
>
> Though I do know a number of Windows users (who have never been Unix
> users) who want multiple desktops, and none that want
> sloppy/mouse-follows focus.
>
Even more - there are tools that give you multiple desktops on windows and
plenty of evidence these are being used.
> -seth
>
>
Sander
I see a dark sail on the horizon
Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]