Re: contents license

[Hello luis, we are discussing the license of Gnome wiki contents on,
see the complete thread here [1], shaunm said that maybe you are

El 4 de agosto de 2009 23:07, Paul Cutler<pcutler gnome org> escribió:
> I agree that CC-SA 3.0 is the best solution.  The issue is in re-licensing
> all of the existing content, which may not be possible due to having to get
> each writer / editors permission.  Anyone have any insight on how Wikipedia
> did it?

Wikipedia moves from licensed under the GFDL to dual licensed under
GFDL plus Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0.

You can see the process here [1] and a interesting lessig post here [2]



Javier Jardón Cabezas

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]