Re: live.gnome.org contents license

[Javier Jardón <javierjc1982 gmail com>]

[Hello luis, we are discussing the license of Gnome wiki contents on,
see the complete thread here [1], shaunm said that maybe you are
interested]

El 4 de agosto de 2009 23:07, Paul Cutler<pcutler gnome org> escribió:
> I agree that CC-SA 3.0 is the best solution.  The issue is in re-licensing
> all of the existing content, which may not be possible due to having to get
> each writer / editors permission.  Anyone have any insight on how Wikipedia
> did it?
>

Wikipedia moves from licensed under the GFDL to dual licensed under
GFDL plus Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0.

You can see the process here [1] and a interesting lessig post here [2]


Regards,

[1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-web-list/2009-August/msg00000.html
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Licensing_update
[3] http://www.lessig.org/blog/2008/11/enormously_important_news_from.html


-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas