Re: 3 godfathers for 3 wgo sections

["Quim Gil" <qgil gnome org>]

On 5/5/07, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> I'm already reviewing these top-level texts.

I mean to pick a whole section below the linked pages. I guess it can
be done either way. As far as all pages end up being covered it
doesn't matter.


> I'm now starting with the
> second-level things (via the right-hand menu that most people will never
> notice).

There was a discussion about the location of this right-hand menu.
Funny that I suggested to be horizontal below the primary and of the
arguments I got was that people wouldn't notice it there.  :)  Or is
the position ok but is the design what makes it non-visible? Suggest
better alternatives, if you have them.


> I'd like to just delete some of the second-level pages. There is too
> much duplication and I think people will still find what they need via
> the top-level tabs. OK, I don't expect you to approve structure changes
> now, but I thought I'd mention it just in case.

Structure was discussed and agreed looong time ago. However, if you
have better suggestions explain them case by case. We can take quick
actions if they make sense.

My feeling is though that most duplications happen at a content level,
due to the fact that different people wrote the text without being
able to read what others were writing. I still believe the pages are
pertinent as units but then again I'm open to improvements, as usual.

--
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org