[wgo] Products - product page

["Quim Gil" <qgil gnome org>]

Let's see how we move from
http://gnome.jardigrec.eu/en/products/epiphany to a page compatible
with our requirements at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/GnomeProducts?action=recall&rev=35#head-1d28c1deec12230e05ae153e8d887e609aeb55d6
(yes, an anterior revision since someone wiped out the fields we had
agreed) . I'm also taking into account the form of the submit product
page.

FIELDS IN THE FORM

- Title: ok
- Short description: ok
- Full description: ok

- Categories
Here I recommend you to take a Drupal taxonomies approach, it's very
complete and I believe it covers very similar needs since at the end
is about categorization as well. Or at least categories introduced
manually, since every website will have a different story, probably.
But this is is a mid term recommendation, for now and for wgo we would
need to have:

TYPE (unique selection)
Applications - Accessibility
Applications - Accessories
Applications - Games
Applications - Graphics
Applications - Internet
Applications - Office
Applications - Programming
Applications - Sound&Video
System - Preferences
System - Administration

TARGET (unique selection)
User
Sysadmin
Developer

OPERATING SYSTEM (checkbox or multiple selection)
GNOME compatible
Mac OS X
MS Windows

PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
C
C++
Java
Mono
PERL
Python

- Self-Certification Checklist
The products listed there are stable, we are not going to use those.

- Review Comment
Not needed

- Unsupported versions
Not needed, although perhaps this is what we need to us to define the
version/release?

- Contact address
Any kind of spam prevention when using mailto:?

- Homepage: ok

- Documentation: ok

- Repository: ok

- Tracker: ok

- Support: ok

- Logo: ok

- Logo link
Needed? Why not defaulting to Homepage?

- Screenshot: ok


LAYOUT

IMO it is quite messy curently. Suggested (broad) organization of elements:

Logo + Title
Short description + Homepage
Categories (being links to their indexes)
Full description + screenshot inserted in text
Table with resources at the bottom, in 2 (3?) columns

There are other little things, but we have already enough to discuss.  :)

--
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org