Re: gtk-doc manual on library.gnome.org (and library.gnome.org status (shining, read it now))



On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 13:17 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 19:06 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > Stefan Kost wrote:
> > 
> > > what needs to be done to get the gtk-doc manual to appear on lgo (its a normal
> > > docbook manual that works fine in yelp)? gtk-doc is an important piece for
> > > develoeprs to get their docs generated. I invest efforts to improve the manual,
> > > but distributions mostly do not package it (I stated to file bugs against some).
> > > It should at least appeah on lgo.
> > 
> > I wanted to wait a little bit before announcing this, but I'll talk
> > about it now.  At GUADEC we had a little meeting with Murray and Lucas
> > (unfortunately Goran couldn't attend) about library.gnome.org, what
> > was holding it up, what we would want to see before 2.20.
> > 
> > I worked a little bit on that on the journey back, waiting for a train in
> > London, but finally decided to almost start from scratch, reusing XSLT,
> > Javascript and a few ideas from current implementation, but not much more.
> > 
> > My current code is available with `bzr get http://www.0d.be/bzr/libgo/';
> > and I should probably push it to svn since what was just an experiment
> > proved a good idea.
> > 
> > I have been running it yesterday night on my webserver, and the output is
> > available at http://lgo.0d.be/; anybody feel free to comment.
> 
> This is hot.  I'm glad you guys are pushing this forward.
> I've made a few changes to gnome-doc-utils over the last
> month or so, many of which were to make lgo work and look
> better.
> 
> I'd like to keep lgo's (and yelp's) XSLT customizations
> to a minimum.  We should push as much stuff upstream as
> makes sense.  For example, I added the TOC sidebar stuff
> directly to g-d-u, and Yelp can turn it off explicitly.

I found your server in google two days ago. This is a fine effort. Your
markup looks fine, but I always see a warning when I browse it (using
the Firefox HTML Validator extension). I wonder if this is because the
pages do not have a DTD.


-- 

__C U R T I S  C.  H O V E Y_______
Guilty of stealing everything I am.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]