Re: *.gnome.org common header
- From: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- To: Claus Schwarm <c schwarm gmx net>
- Cc: gnome-web-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: *.gnome.org common header
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:02:03 -0600
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:43 +0100, Claus Schwarm wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:59:25 -0600
> Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org> wrote:
>
> >
> > I can give at least two examples of a global header
> > being incredibly successful, even across multiple
> > subdomains:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > It does work, when done correctly.
> >
>
> I think, there's a difference between GNOME and your examples: Apple
> and Wolfram are organizations. They can make a decision and force
> sub-site maintainers to follow the decision.
>
> We lack such an organization: Everybody forks the design whenever it
> seems fit.
>
> It's probably easier for our visitors to have 'outside' links clearly
> marked as such. Let's just declare pages such as GUADEC as external
> when linking them from the main pages. Every sub-site maintainer is
> then free to use whatever seems useful.
Sure, we can't threaten to fire people if they don't conform,
but that hasn't stopped us from making a good product before.
Our desktop is a collection of applications and libraries with
dozens of maintainers. And yet, we manage to have a consistent
look-and-feel.
Random points that will help a global header succeed:
* Second-level navigation should be accommodated, but not
required. It should be tailorable to particular subsites.
* The standard header without the second level navigation
should occupy a small amount of screen real estate.
* The standard header without the second level navigation
should be visually attractive on its own, and it should
be clearly "the Gnome header".
Um, probably other points. It's early.
--
Shaun
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]