Re: flawed CVS Scripts (was Re: d.g.o/dotplan/schedule outdated!)
- From: Curtis Hovey <sinzui cox net>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>, gnome-web-list <gnome-web-list gnome org>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Subject: Re: flawed CVS Scripts (was Re: d.g.o/dotplan/schedule outdated!)
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:19:14 -0400
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 13:48 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 07:08, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="James Henstridge">
> >
> > > However, using rsync to copy the files from a temporary build tree to the
> > > live tree is better for caching. Apache generates the ETag from the file
> > > size, inode number and modification time, so even if you keep the
> > > modification time the same, web browsers and caches will think the file
> > > has changed.
> >
> > Cool, that's definitely preferable.
>
> Just make sure that you --dry-run or whatever the first time; there
> may well be unmanaged content in the tree that *is* needed.
Good call. Making d.g.o's API docs are a separate job. This would be
easier, possibly more reliable, if we kept valuable docs in a library.
Docs in the library would never be deleted because they have some value
even after they are obsolete. All other Web sites only maintain current
materials.
--
__C U R T I S C. H O V E Y____________________
sinzui cox net
Guilty of stealing everything I am.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]