Re: XHTML 1.0 Strict Document Type

[Alexander Winston <alexander winston comcast net>]

On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 00:28, Curtis C. Hovey wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 00:15, Alexander Winston wrote:
> > I believe that GNOME's Web pages should be held to higher standards than
> > a Transitional document type. Already, most of the Web pages that are
> > valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional are valid XHTML 1.0 Strict to boot. I am
> > very interested in others' thoughts on this topic.
> 
> Are you volunteering?

YES! :)