Re: Web Standards and the new layout



> I disagree. We ought to use <h1> in the manner you've described <h2>.
> I don't think there's any point wasting the header on information that
> is provided elsewhere. You could provide structural context with the
> <title> if absolutely necessary, but I would be worried if the <h1>
> weren't context enough.
Either way. I just wanted to rationalize the logo as something more than
a visual element. (In which case, it could probably be blotted out
completely for non-visual displays, eg. alt="", display:none, etc, as
its recapped in hdrNav)

> Which page is this on? It's certainly not done with the current w.g.o
> or d.g.o templates (and the navigation area is static for the time
> being).

d.g.o:
> <dl>
>  <dt><a href="/news/"><b>News</b></a></dt>
>   <dd>
>    The latest GNOME developer news and GNOME Weekly Summaries.
>   </dd>
> </dl>
> <dl>
>  <dt><a href="/dotplan/"><b>Release Planning</b></a></dt>
>   <dd>
>    A feast of essential GNOME future planning information.
>  </dd>
> </dl>

.Brian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]