Re: l10n/i18n issue in gvfs [and glib]

On Jan 9, 2008 4:17 AM, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:

> > Waiting for this release, OK to use intltool in gvf? Just as workaround
> > solution: gvfs don't need intltool 'cause all translations come from
> > plain C source files (no .desktop, no .schemas, no .glade...)
> Yeah. Can you hack that up?

Actually, I'd really rather not have an intltool dependency in glib.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]