Re: gvfs status report

[Raphael Bosshard <bosshrap zhwin ch>]

Hello there!

I agree that such a thing would not belong into gvfs. Not that I wanted 
to suggest that. ^^
I was not aware of mathusalem, but after looking through your (?) blog 
at apinc.org, I seems to be exactly what I had in mind. How hard, do you 
think, will it be to extend mathusalem with gvfs-capabilities? I'll have 
to take a look at the repo... :D

So long,
raphael

Steve Frécinaux wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 19:18 +0100, Raphael Bosshard wrote:
>
> > No more seperate dialog windows for Epiphany, GFTP, Nautilus and so on. 
> > Everything available in one applet...
>
> Actually that's what was intended with mathusalem, that unfortunately
> hasn't seen much news since SoC because I've been rather busy. But IMHO
> it's too high-level to belong directly to gvfs, and would be quite
> limitative. KDE for instance is moving from their KIO-UIServer (that did
> that, but with one dialog for each job) to a more generic KUIServer).