Re: some gvfs code

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 12:40 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> My personal preference would be to simply check for <sys/xattr.h>
> presence, and only look for libattr if that fails to support glibc 2.2.
> If either libattr is present, or <sys/xattr.h> is around, HAVE_XATTR
> would be used. As claimed in a followup of [1], the glibc syscalls are
> stubbed out for operating systems not supporting xattrs, and will return
> ENOSYS.

Sounds good to me. Wanna hack it up?